E · Proof Corpus

1.112026-08-29

E.1 · Propositions

  • Prop. 1 (Interior membership addition preserves existing normalizations). An admission that does not redefine a normalization extreme leaves every previously included unit's normalized values — and hence FA — unchanged; the index can grow without “restating” the past.
  • Prop. 2 (Construct–indicator consistency of the influence definition). The four-channel definition of social influence (use ×\times discussion ×\times iteration ×\times diffusion) maps injectively to the four composition blocks; the operationalization preserves the construct's meaning.
  • Prop. 3 (Circuit-breaker dilution bound). When a degraded source is dropped and the factor is re-normalized over surviving sources, the factor changes by at most ws0/(1−ws0)w_{s_0}/(1-w_{s_0}), the ratio of the dropped weight to the surviving weight.
  • Prop. 4 (Robust scale is bounded under a single outlier). The robust scale 1.4826 MAD1.4826\,\mathrm{MAD} changes by a bounded amount under a single extreme outlier, whereas the sample standard deviation can increase without bound.
  • Prop. 5 (Ratio invariance of linear factors). A common proportional change to all raw values leaves every linear-normalized factor — and hence FA — unchanged.
  • Prop. 6 (Two-level renormalization is a projection). The two-level renormalization of missing values is the orthogonal projection of the full composite onto the subspace of present blocks in the weighted ℓ2\ell_2 sense, and stays in [0,1][0,1] when the present block values do.
  • Prop. 7 (FA monotonicity in its blocks). FA is non-decreasing in every block and in every within-block factor, and strictly increasing in any block with positive weight.
  • Prop. 8 (Exact conservation of the adjusted pool). At every time, ∑i∈IΘi(t)≡∑i∈IFAiadj(t0)\sum_{i\in\mathcal{I}}\Theta_i(t) \equiv \sum_{i\in\mathcal{I}}\mathrm{FA}^{\mathrm{adj}}_i(t_0); the live term reallocates but never changes the pool total.
  • Prop. 9 (Approximate conservation of the base pool). The relative gap between ∑Θi\sum\Theta_i and ∑FAi\sum\mathrm{FA}_i is bounded by Dcap+RcapD_{\mathrm{cap}} + R_{\mathrm{cap}}; in the current configuration with no streak and no incident, the sums are equal.
  • Prop. 10 (Well-posedness and boundedness). Under the unified scale contract and the missing-value taxonomy, every factor and composite lies in [0,1][0,1]; hence FAi∈[0,100]\mathrm{FA}_i \in [0,100] for all ii.
  • Prop. 11 (State-pricing consequences). Under the state-pricing axiom and the renewal rule: (a) a renewal jump equals full value minus residual; (b) a fresh event enters at full value with zero response lag; (c) at most one active pulse exists per primary key and the renewal log is a deterministic replay ledger.
  • Prop. 12 (Audit inequality). For every Originator and time, Hi(t)≥∣RIi(t)∣\mathrm{H}_i(t) \ge |\mathrm{RI}_i(t)| over the same envelope set — the heat line is an upper bound on the signed signal.
  • Prop. 13 (Monotonicity of sector aggregates, conditional). Holding membership, scale, and method fixed, if every member's Γ\Gamma is non-decreasing then the sector mean and maximum are non-decreasing.
  • Prop. 14 (Rank invariance under the deflator). Multiplication by a common positive deflator preserves cross-sectional ranking and relative gaps of Θ\Theta at every time.
  • Prop. 15 (Nominal display is drift-free and converges). The display-noise process has zero mean and is forced to zero at the close of each window; the nominal line does not drift from the actual line and equals it at the close.
  • Prop. 16 (Centering preserves cross-sectional ordering of the anchor). With equal live signals, flagship ordering is determined entirely by anchor ordering; the live term cannot flip it.
  • Prop. 17 (BR transition convergence). Under (32): the bridge is zero at time HH and thereafter; the published path converges to the new fair value; the bridge never deposits into FA and never enters the RI feed; with no mechanical change no bridge is generated.

E.2 · Lemmas, corollary, and property

  • Lemma A (Decay kernel positivity). For t≥tet \ge t_e and T1/2(e)>0T_{1/2}(e)>0, the kernel 2−(t−te)/T1/2(e)2^{-(t-t_e)/T_{1/2}(e)} lies in (0,1](0,1] and is strictly decreasing in tt.
  • Lemma B (Renewal jump magnitude). A single renewal jump of pulse ee equals Ae−re(t)A_e - r_e(t), the new full value minus the residual of the voided pulse at the renewal time; the jump is therefore non-negative.
  • Corollary A (Zero-sum character of the live term). The live term kri(RIi−RI‾)k_{\mathrm{ri}}(\mathrm{RI}_i - \overline{\mathrm{RI}}) has zero sum over the included set at every time; it reallocates within the pool and never changes the pool total.
  • Property A (Zero-reset of sustained leadership). Dropping out of all leadership thresholds sets D=0D = 0 immediately with no decay tail; re-entry accumulates from the current tier. No double-counting of inertia that the stock dimensions already carry.

Back to contents  |  ← D · Formal Derivations  |  F · Algorithms →

Not live trading · Not a financial transaction · No recharge feature · Not investment advice